Article at https://www.rumormillnews.com/cgi-bin/forum.cgi?read=173176 .

Snip: "In some 225 years neither law professors, academic scholars, teachers, students, lawyers or congressional legislators after much debate have not been able to satisfactorily explain or demonstrate the Framers intended purpose of Second Amendment of the Constitution."

There are only two possible reasons for the above. Either the parties are actively engaged in subversion and obfuscation, or they are just idiots.

Amy Coney Barrett’s dilemma is that she serves the Vatican first and the legitimate People of the American Republic second. Her everlasting salvation is determined by her Catholic faith therefore she must serve the will of the Church irregardless of Constitutional intent. The Church is anathema to natural organic rights and freedoms, both individually and collectively. She knows that.

The State is an unnatural entity created to serve the interests of the individual and the legitimate population. It is a form of proxy through which action can be taken on behalf of the people.

This is the intent and meaning of the second amendment. It addresses the qualifications and the calling into action of the militia through proxy of state and nothing more. It does not address the individual right of members to keep, carry and use fire arms for personal defense or defense of others. It does not address the right of those who are excluded from militia by age, health or sex. It never has and it never will address these issues. It doesn't need to.

The personal right to keep, carry and use fire arms is found in the Ninth and Tenth Amendments.

Amendment IX
The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.

The natural right to defense of self and others is as old as nature itself. Nature is the author, has authorized that right. When America was being settled it was common and expected practice to keep, carry and use fire arms for personal defense or defense of others. The practice was so obvious that it was unthinkable that it needed to be enumerated. That lack of enumeration can in no way deny or disparage the common, natural and expected right to keep, carry and use fire arms for personal defense or defense of others. Only in the minds of those parties who are actively engaged in subversion or obfuscation or in the minds of idiots can this right be denied.

Amendment X
The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the states, are reserved to the states respectively, or to the people.

Power is active force. The United States (DC) as an unnatural entity created to serve the interests of the individual and legitimate states and the populations thereof cannot abridge the potential or actual use of force (militia) by the state as proxy for the people in defense of self or defense of others, nor can the state abridge the right of the individual to potential or active use of force in the keep, carry or use of firearms for personal defense or defense of others.

The issue is very simple; subterfuge, obfuscation, idiots and the gang of nine outlaws not withstanding.

Amy Coney Barrett is not stupid. She knows these things. She just doesn't want you to know.