The Relationship Between The 2nd Amendment And A Planned Military Defeat
It is interesting to see that many folks are making this connection, and I believe that the two are so interconnected as to be a very probable aspect of the overall plan that the Powers That Be (PTB) are working on. As most folks here on RMN know there has been a consorted push to undo, cancel, amend, do away with, or at least get around the 2nd amendment now for many years. Under Obama there was a rash of “false flag” mass shootings designed to pressure the public into demanding such change – and that didn’t work – then there was the push to “register” every gun – and that didn’t work – and there have been attempts to outlaw various aspects of the whole industry, limit gun sales at gun shows, create ammunition shortages, etc., etc. All of these things have one thing in common; it is imperative that the public be DISARMED!
Throughout history – and this is pretty much without exception – tyrannical governments have ALWAYS disarmed the public before they implemented the most extreme aspects of their agenda. The 2nd amendment (which will immortalize Thomas Jefferson for all time) was intended to prevent that type of evil from happening. And for those who say that it wasn’t to protect folks from a run-amuck government they need to study their history a bit closer. Even President Washington said this bluntly, that a well-armed population was the best defense against tyranny.
In any case, we don’t need history or philosophy to show us the way, all we need do is look at Australia right at this very moment in time. They were bamboozled into giving up their guns a few years ago, and now look at them! Their government is treating them with utter contempt, and they are living in conditions rapidly moving toward those found in places like North Korea!
So, how does this connect to a military defeat? Think about this for a moment. The Chinese have openly stated – or rather the CCP has openly said, it is important that we don’t confuse the two, it is communism that is the enemy not people suffering under its evil rule – that they intend to colonize North America. They do not want to “conquer” North America, they want to “colonize” North America. There is a difference. They don’t want to deal with the people, they want the land; they don’t need people they need food. But in order to take this land and basically make it a part of China they will have to remove some 300 million well armed, and fiercely determined, people who have a long established record as unbending warriors. They know this, and they also know that this task would be near impossible under the present circumstances where the people are better equipped (at least in the sense of small arms) than many armies in the world. And these same people would be both fighting for their homes and way of life, and are skilled in the use of these weapons. Therefore it becomes a primary military objective to remove this threat before engaging in the actual invasion.
But, all of their efforts to date have failed. The American population isn’t as dumb as they thought we were. Nor are we as gullible as they had hoped. It is probable that their captured (bribed/blackmailed) politicians, and imbedded agents, have told them that it is highly likely that any further attempts to disarm the public in these classical ways will also fail. Each attempt to do so has INCREASED GUN SALES, not increased demand to get ride of them.
So, what is to be done? First off, develop and release a biological weapon that would kill as many as possible – both the virus itself, and the “clot shot” fit this bill, and were apparently developed in conjunction with treasonous Americans, and probably following a long range plan of some kind. But that could not be counted upon to work either – it could be hoped to work, but Americans have shown that they have this stubborn tendency to say, “F**k off!” – or as is now the well spread mime “lets go Brandon”. But if they could be weakened, their military seriously degraded, their veterans sickened, their police and emergency service personal disorganized, their transportation and distribution system mangled, and at the same time key positions in their government structure infiltrated with controlled assets then when they are at their most vulnerable they are sucked into a war – a real war, with a real enemy that is capable of inflicting serious damage quickly – and if their top leadership is “owned” (compromised, bribed, blackmailed, promised great things, etc.) then they can be defeated on the battle field, and betrayed on the home front.
How does this help them? Well, the terms of surrender – which no ordinary Americans would have ANY INPUT on – would specify that all weapons MUST BE CONFISCATED. And since this “surrender” is an internationally recognized legal procedure all Americans would be compelled to comply with it, or be classified as ‘’war criminals” and – get this – THEY WOULD BE CALLED THE TRAITORS!
My guess is that the conditions of this “surrender” would allow for most of the Constitution to stay in effect – only select parts that are a “problem” would be nullified, and that the governmental system would be more or less left in place until the enemy was well enough entrenched to start the actual round up of people for extermination. This would give the illusion that America was still sort of free and no one was being hurt except for those crazy bastards still resisting – those “criminals and traitors” out hiding in the woods causing all this trouble.
No doubt the actual plan is more “fleshed out” and detailed, but the essence seems pretty clear if one takes into consideration all the seemingly foolish crap that has been happening. As long as “we the people” NEVER GIVE UP OUR WEAPONS then “they the tyrants” can’t win. When we cut to the bottom line it really is that simple.
They can’t surrender a nation if the army of that nation is the very people who live there! The nation is made up of the people – NOT THE GOVERNMENT! When the government no longer represents the will of the people it is no longer legitimate, and its surrender would be null and void.
