8/14 Update requested by Bill Holter: Explosion not a nuke.
Thank everyone for your responses to yesterday’s article, there were well over 500 to which Jim and I have responded to. I spoke this morning with a nuclear physicist to get her opinion which follows;
“Bill, The blast is hard to see because a text box is right over the explosion on my screen. In my opinion, from what I can see, the blast does not look nuclear. It resembles more an explosion of a large fuel/oil storage tank, as would be found at a port. Also, there is no info in English on how far the filmers were from the blast, which would help in scale.”
Of the many comments received, the most common was “fuel ordinance”. I try always to be accurate and get to the truth which is why we went to the source of a scientist. I now believe the explosion was in fact some sort of fuel or chemical, most common thought amongst comments was LNG (liquid natural gas). Whether the explosion was or was not an accident may never be known. Accidents do happen, the “timing” of this accident does add the flavor of curiosity. Standing watch, Bill Holter
The only pay your RMN moderators receive comes from ads.
If you're using an ad blocker, please consider putting RMN in your ad blocker's whitelist.
Serving Truth and Freedom
Worldwide since 1996
Politically Incorrect News
Stranger than Fiction
Usually True!
