cultures still seeing chicks as ideally pretty pet service animals, and sausage casings 'owners'. It's like that in much of the Middle East, Africa, Asia, and south of the border.

On the other hand, in Japan, China, South Korea, the West, it seems like chicks are doing great job turning themselves into liabilities for the most part. Hence the growth of MGTOW, though in South Korea we also have 4B. Increasing attitudes of entitlement and lack of accountability are doing wonders for that. The hypergamous attitude is repulsive to me. CUTE REMORA (one analogous description of many.) FOR RENT OR FOR SALE! No wonder misogyny exists, though I'd say the best way to deal with it is MGTOW. On the other hand, it seems some cultures really fight the concept of chicks being self sustaining. I'd love to know why. What's the advantage to the collective?

I must also add, life alone for both genders (Or DINK.) is way easier than nuclear family. You have more time, a LOT less work at home, and more money if you got into a decent occupation and didn't feckin' go to college to major in something stupid like gender studies or underwater basket weaving, etc. . . Actually, an apprenticeship or trade school makes more sense.

Then again, the human race as a whole isn't exactly pragmatic, is it? If it were, would the state of the world be as it is? Gods, from my perspective, a lot of lives might as well be that of a dog spending it's life chained to a dog house in the sun, and fed nothing but dry Purina dog food all its life.