"From the neoreactionary accelerationists of the Dark Enightenment to the AI-spun social credit web of the NEONERDS, today author and researcher Iain Davis takes us on a whirlwind tour of his new book, The Technocratic Dark State." -(The Corbett Report).

A Piece Of The Transcript That Is A Key Bit Of Take-Away From The Interview:
32:49
Iain Davis, what is the way out of this technocratic dark state? (James Corbett).
32:54 (Iain Davis):
Well, very interesting, actually. I just attended a protest in the UK standing against digital ID.
33:01
But the reason that I attended a protest, which is very unusual for me because I don't believe in protesting against something you can't change,
33:08
namely the government, is that this wasn't about that. This was about non-compliance. This was about encouraging people not to comply with the rollout of things like digital ID.

33:20
Digital ID is, if you like, the gateway into this system.
33:26
Once we've adopted digital ID that could potentially be linked to programmable digital money, then that's when technocracy will start to have a massive controlling
33:36
influence over our lives. And we simply don't have to use it. The infrastructure has already been erected around us, but it is of no value if we don't use it.
33:50
So there are just very simple things that, I mean, it's perhaps been said ad nauseum, but it's true nonetheless.
33:56
If we focus on using things like cash, if we keep our use of digital ID products
34:04
like bank cards, like payment cards, like store cards to an absolute minimum,
34:12
if we keep that to a minimum if we trade with each other if we if we you know
34:18
put the brakes on or at least try to make things as awkward as possible for those
34:24
that are demanding things like taxes from us i'm not advocating not paying tax because obviously that
34:31
can get you in a lot of trouble illegally but that doesn't mean that we have to to jump through every hoop
34:37
in order to pay it we can do things like say well do you have an alternative and try
34:43
and retard the roll out of these these things as much as possible if we do that hopefully
34:49
that will give us some time to look at things like lawful and legal challenges constitutional challenges that will that will certainly show people or certainly
35:01
show them that we're not going to adopt these these systems and that is essential.
35:07
There's the old 3% thing, about 3% of the population can change everything.
35:13
If enough of us do that, then we can start building better parallel systems
35:19
that we can use that are not going to involve us subjecting ourselves to total
35:28
technological control. Because that's what they're trying to foist upon us.
35:34
So, you know, and another important thing that I stress throughout the book is none of this is new.
35:40
This is not new. The only aspect of this that is new is the technological capability
35:47
that they now have at hand. Other than that, you know, for example,
35:52
Land talks about this concept of hyper-racism, which is just eugenics.
35:58
It's just eugenics. The basic concept of the sovereign state is one tiny class ruling everybody
36:10
else. And that's just oligarchy. That is thousands of years old. So this is nothing new. They're just reinventing the wheel.
36:20
But unfortunately, and this is why it's so important, this is why it's pressing, they do now have the technological ability to do things that they have hitherto only dreamed possible.
36:33
So, you know, that's the problem, the acute problem that we've got now.
36:39
But if we don't adopt that technology or if we, you know, and we already have adopted most of it.
36:45
Most of us have already adopted the things that could be used to control us, our fondle slabs, as you are very wisely and fond of saying. Yeah.
36:55
We don't have to use them we can there's nothing to stop we don't just because we've got them now doesn't mean
37:00
that we are I used to have a smartphone I don't have a smartphone anymore it's that simple you know
37:07
so so we if we if we reject this stuff they can't control us with it because it they won't they won't have access to us isn't it we can't comply our way
37:18
out of this because we know that the path of least resistance and the one that will be set before us is the one that leads us to directly into the moths of
37:25
this technocratic dark state. So we have to go the other way and that will involve non-compliance.