: So, I have a larger article I’ve been working on, but this is
: BREAKING and potentially HUGE, so I wanted to write a
: “mini” article on a something I unearthed today, completely
: by accident.

: This mini-article will concern exactly ONE #QAnon drop from
: early this morning, but I think you’ll agreee… this is
: huge!

: Let’s begin, with #Qdrop 3195: So Q gives us a link to the
: Supreme Court’s oral argument from 3/20/19, and directs us
: to listen to #RBG’s questions at the time listed above.

: Here’s Q’s link: I listened last night as was immediately
: discouraged because, frankly, I’m hoping RBG kicks the
: bucket soon. She has had some recent health scares, as I’m
: sure you’re all aware, but here, she sounded cogent,
: coherent, and quite vocal.

: And unlike some who thought this was the result of a “voice
: double,” this sounded exactly like RBG to me. Here’s an
: interview clip for reference: So yeah, that’s her on the
: Supreme Court clip, as far as I know. (And if it’s not,
: it’s a heckuva voice actress, because she’s a dead-ringer
: for RBG).

: But something was bothering me about this clip, and I wasn’t
: sure what it was exactly, so I returned to it early this
: afternoon…

: I had it playing in a tab on my browser when I clicked ahead,
: and suddenly heard what I thought was a repeat of audio I
: had just heard.

: “Huh, that’s weird…” I thought to myself.

: I clicked back and listened again.

: There was that voice again.

: Kagan’s voice!

: I clicked forward…

: Kagan AGAIN!

: Listen for yourself. Start at ~21:25 and wait for Kagan to
: come in and say: Ms. Johnson, some-
: And then click forward to ~22:38. Again, you’ll hear: Ms.
: Johnson, some-
: I had to see what was going on, so I went to the Supreme
: Court’s site, and pulled the MP3 of the arguments from
: there: I then isolated the audio clips, one after the
: other: Audio Player

: 00:00
: 00:00

: Use Up/Down Arrow keys to increase or decrease volume.
: You’ll hear Kagan interrupt in the first clip, some silence in
: between, and then Kagan speaking again.

: (And for the record, yes, this is a lossy MP3. I was working
: with a WAV file on my own computer, which you can gab here,
: if you want to repeat this analysis manually, yourself:
: https://files.catbox.moe/qusr5h.wav )

: One of my readers on Gab, @jhomes55 did me a favor of aligning
: the two clips on top of each other, so you can hear it even
: better: Audio Player

: 00:00
: 00:00

: Use Up/Down Arrow keys to increase or decrease volume.

: Sounds an AWFUL lot like editing, right?

: Well, the only way to be 100% sure is to look at the spectral
: graph of the waveforms.

: So I did.

: Here’s from the “interruption” clip: And here’s from the Kagan
: solo clip: The similarities are astounding. But to be sure,
: I had to overlay the two clips: See that “spiral” on the
: right?

: Yeah, this is the same clip.

: Which means…

: Someone is EDITING the oral arguments heard at SCOTUS in a way
: we’ve never been publicly aware of, before.

: They inserted RBG’s audio.

: The waveforms PROVE that beyond a shadow of a doubt, and
: anyone who tells you otherwise is selling you a bill of
: goods.

: Why did they do this? I don’t know.

: But it’s astounding to consider what they’re hiding. Cameras
: aren’t allowed in the Supreme Court right now, but whatever
: deception they’re pulling over there needs to be exposed.
: If there’s a Justice sitting on the court who can’t
: function due to failing health, and they’re going to such
: lengths to cover it up, that Justice needs to step down
: immediately!

: Because now we have hard, numbers-based evidence that they’re
: hiding something, pulled directly from SCOTUS’ own website.
: And the only way to hold the highest court in the land
: accountable is by making the public aware of what exactly
: is going on!

This is my first post, I hope I did it right.