Hi.

Well, if he wasn't shanghaied then he must have agreed to terms and conditions of begettment.

Soooo, his parents can counter sue for failure to fulfill condition of contract, false charges and defamation of character.

If they are smart they will sue for all of his rupees and have him jailed and then his good life will factually be pointless.

=================================================
: (Sounds like a page outta my book, and I hope this takes off
: faster than MGTOW, for the sake of the planet. YES, I'M A
: MEMBER OF THE CHURCH OF EUTHANASIA, AND I EVEN EXCHANGED A
: FEW E-MAILS WITH CHRIS KORDA. . .What ever gender it is
: these days.)

: SNIP: In February, a 27-year-old Indian man named Raphael
: Samuel announced plans for an unusual lawsuit. He was going
: to sue his parents for begetting him. “It was not our
: decision to be born,” he told the BBC. “Human existence is
: totally pointless.”

: Samuel recently told me over Skype from Mumbai that his is a
: good life, and he is actually close to his parents. His
: complaint is more fundamental: he believes it is wrong to
: bring new people into the world without their consent. He
: wanted to sue his parents for a symbolic amount of money,
: such as a single rupee, “to instill that fear among parents
: in general. Because now parents don’t think before having a
: child,” he told me.

: Samuel subscribes to a philosophy called anti-natalism. The
: basic tenet of anti-natalism is simple but, for most of us,
: profoundly counterintuitive: that life, even under the best
: of circumstances, is not a gift or a miracle, but rather a
: harm and an imposition. According to this logic, the
: question of whether to have a child is not just a personal
: choice but an ethical one – and the correct answer is
: always no.