I was out reading the news
http://www.cbc.ca/news/business/cpp-private-pension-bankruptcy-1.3647128

added a comment off the cuff
and got disabled
and a BIG PINK LINE
to tell me I didn't something off tune
so here is the comment to what I saw

Cathy Walters
@Sam Montana

Oh Dear

how old are you?
within 5 years this way or that way
a range

it is a thinking process thing with me
I'm over 60
and I had my own
xy and z
I loved math
and trig
I must tell you not necessary
in most recipes

here is a scenario
let's say jobs stay the same
and the hugely readjusted
unemployment numbers go up
and not down
I don't listen to the US numbers
they do this overtime a President leaves
and they seem to be consistent within
5.4 5.8 5.7
could in the fours -- for how long
10 days --- whatever
some people have quit looking
and they are not counted in the
numbers being manipulated
for sure in the US

but us truthful Canadians
holier than thou
we don't do that

left

Cmanynames« less

Content disabled.
by CBC

Sam Montana
Good grief, the math is simple enough for anyone to get it other than the liberals.

1-There are an X number of Canadian adults who pay into CPP
2-There are a Y number who retire every year (a percentage of X)
3-There are a Z number of people who join the workforce every year (more or less similar to X)

X is always greater than Y-Z which means there should always be enough money in CPP coffers to payout.

THE ONLY reason that there is not enough money in CPP to pay retirees more than a PITTANCE is because successive liberal governments have pilfered the money« less

old history
old friends

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1okIUdtHrc0

Cath